Question 3:
- Within
the context of the novel, Eldorado really is the “best of all possible
worlds.” Overflowing with riches, ruled by an enlightened king, it is a
land with no need of courts or prisons, where the inhabitants lack nothing
and live in a state of continual gratitude. Why do Candide and Cacambo
decide to leave such a paradise and return to a world riddled with greed,
lust, ignorance, dishonesty, and cruelty, a world where violence both
savage and civilized is the norm? What aspects of human nature is Voltaire
satirizing when he writes that “our two happy wanderers resolved to be
happy no longer and to seek His Majesty’s permission to depart” (p.
49)?
When Candide and Cacambo leave El Dorado they
leave behind the best they’ve had their entire journey. I believe at that time
of the book they were ignorant to the troubles of the world. They left thinking
they could survive on the riches and jewels without harm or evil occurring to
them. This was an ignorant action because if there is evil elsewhere and this
is the best of all possible worlds, then surely they had the possibility of
being robbed of their possessions because robbing is an act of evil. They were
too optimistic about their fortunes and success.
- At the
end of the novel, Martin says, “Let us set to work and stop proving
things, for that is the only way to make life bearable” (p. 93), echoing
the Turkish farmer who says, “our work keeps at bay the three great evils:
boredom, vice, and necessity” (p. 92). Do you think Voltaire is endorsing
this view? Why would doing physical work be preferable to the life of a
philosopher?
I disagree with your answer Michaela. I think that Voltaire is saying that men are addicted to evil and that no such place could even exist. I do not believe that they were ignorant to the troubles of the world because Candide has already endured some of these terrors. I believe that Voltaire is saying that people go and look for evil. They do not try to avoid and man is the cause of evil.
ReplyDelete